ABSTRACT
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of chest tubes (CT) inserted via three approaches in COVID-19 patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO): open thoracostomies (OT), percutaneously at bedside (PERC), and percutaneously by interventional radiology (PERC IR). Methods: We conducted an institutional review board - approved retrospective study of all COVID-19 patients who required CT placement while undergoing ECMO in our institution from February 2020 till February 2022. Insertions prior to ECMO cannulation or after decannulation, and those related to post-operative lung transplantation during ECMO were excluded from our analysis. Depending on the insertion approach, eligible CT insertion events were divided in three groups: OT, PERC and PERC IR. Data regarding patients' demographics and CT characteristics, clinical indications and associated complications for each group were collected and analyzed. Bleeding related to CT insertion was diagnosed based on requirement of blood transfusion, cessation of anticoagulation and/or ongoing bloody CT output. Results: Study criteria were met by 43 patients, with 35 (83.7%) of male sex. Mean age was 45 years. Mean BMI was 31.6 kg/m2. Forty patients (93.0%) had COVID-related acute respiratory distress syndrome as primary diagnosis. All patients but one had been receiving therapeutic anticoagulation which was held prior to CT insertion. Eighty-seven CT insertion events were recorded, of which 34 (39.1%) comprised the OT group, 20 (23.0%) the PERC group, and 33 (37.9%) the PERC IR group. Table 1 demonstrates a descriptive comparison of CT and insertion data among the three groups. Table 2 depicts the major outcomes among the three groups. Conclusions: For COVID-19 patients on ECMO, insertion of CTs percutaneously by IR is associated with significantly fewer bleeding episodes, transfusions, thoracic consults and explorations in the operating room compared to bedside OT or percutaneous CTs. One third of the percutaneously placed CTs by IR required tube upsizing in the IR suite, a rate still lower compared to the overall CT manipulations or repeat interventions required for CTs inserted via OT or percutaneously at bedside. (Table Presented).
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Dermatology , Telemedicine , Hospitals , Humans , Pandemics , Referral and ConsultationABSTRACT
Purpose Characteristics and outcomes of heart transplant (HT) recipients who contract coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) have been poorly described. The current study was undertaken to better understand the risk obesity may pose in this patient population Methods A prospectively-maintained Trans-CoV-VAD Registry containing HT recipients at 11 participating institutions who presented with SARS-CoV-2 were reviewed. Presenting characteristics, hospitalization rates, ventilator & intensive care unit usage, and mortality were queried. Patients were grouped by body mass index (BMI) into obese (BMI≥30 k/m2) and non-obese cohorts (BMI<30 kg/m2). Comparisons between groups were made utilizing chi-squared, Fisher's exact, and Mann-Whitney U-tests. Multivariable logistic regression models were utilized Results Across all centers, 85 HT recipients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 were identified, of whom 26 (31%) were obese. Median time from HT to diagnosis was 4.6 (1.8-13.8) years. No differences in age (57 vs 60 p 0.85) or female gender (31% vs 24% p 0.5) were noted between obese and non-obese patients. On presentation, obese patients were more symptomatic with higher rates of cough (76% vs 48% p 0.02), dyspnea (62% vs 41% p 0.09), diarrhea (60% vs 35% p 0.03), and headache (35% vs 14% p 0.03). No differences in rates of admission (62% vs 64% p 0.8), ICU presentation (44% vs 35% p 0.6) or need for mechanical ventilation were noted (38% vs 22% p 0.2). More secondary infections were noted amongst obese patients (32% vs 13% p 0.04). On follow-up, mortality was similar between groups (12% vs 9% p 0.7). On multivariable modeling, BMI was not associated with increased adjusted odds of hospital/ICU admission or mechanical ventilation (p>0.10) Conclusion Acute presentations of SARS-CoV-2 amongst HT recipients carry significantly higher mortality over the general population. Obesity appears to impact presenting symptoms and secondary infections, but does not strongly impact ICU requirements or mortality
ABSTRACT
Purpose Infection with the Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) is particularly dangerous for patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD). Obesity is associated with worse outcomes among both LVAD and SARS-CoV-2 patients. This study evaluated the risk of obesity among LVAD patients who contracted SARS-CoV-2. Methods A prospectively maintained Trans-CoV-VAD Registry of LVAD patients from 11 institutions who presented with SARS-CoV-2 was analyzed. Two cohorts, 1) non-obese and 2) obese, were formed utilizing a body mass index (BMI) cutoff of 30 k/m2. Presenting characteristics, hospitalization rates, ventilator & intensive care unit usage, and mortality were compared. Chi-squared, Fisher's exact test, Mann-Whitney U-tests and multivariable logistic regression models were utilized. Results Across all centers, 46 LVAD patients contracted SARS-CoV-2 during the study period of whom 19 (41%) were obese. Time from LVAD implantation to infection was 2.4±2.5 years. Age and gender profiles were similar. Non-obese and obese patients had similar presenting symptoms, most commonly cough (52% vs 47%), fever (48% vs 37%), dyspnea (41% vs 47%) and fatigue (41% vs 37%). No difference in rates of hospital (70% vs 63%, p 0.8) and ICU admissions (26% vs 37%, p 0.3) was observed. Hospital (20.0±23.2 vs 17.1±14.2) and ICU length of stay were similar (16.2±26.1 vs. 13.9±13.1 days). Obese patients were more likely to require mechanical ventilation than non-obese patients (7% vs 26%, p<0.05). Overall risk of mortality was significantly elevated but similar (19% vs 16%, p 0.9). On multivariable modeling, BMI was not associated with increased risk of hospitalization, ICU admission or mechanical ventilation (p>0.10). Conclusion Among LVAD patients who contract SARS-CoV-2, obese patients appear to have higher risk of intubation, but did not experience increased ICU requirements or mortality.